SLC: Nomenclature

The Secular Library Classification system suggests a semantic pattern that can be used to present a comprehensible system of explicit knowledge, which should benefit humanity.

In my research and development of personal skills with categorization, I have been able to better notice and describe semantic problems. Surprisingly, it seems to me that the discipline of taxonomy lacks a standard system of nomenclature to begin with. I have disagreements with the standard definitions of classification, taxonomy, and ontology. 

General Taxonomy Nomenclature Correction

In philosophy class, Ontology tends to be an unwitting exploration of classification theories under the auspices of the study of existence. In practical terms, Ontology is the entirety of recorded knowledge, just lacking a reliable classification system. 

Taxonomy is the listing of knowledge. Whereas Epistemology is the study of knowledge theories, Taxonomy is the practical representation of theories using visual cues to distinguish the categories of knowledge.

A category is the unit of a taxonomy. 

Class is the level of categories.

Collation is the order of categories in a class.

Attributes are the basic categories (metadata) used to identify positions in a collation.

Classification is the set of rules for distinguishing classes. (As of 26-03-02, Wikipedia still equates classification with categorization.)

Correlations are the coordinate system derived from the ordinate comparison of advanced sets of the primary collation. Similar to Plato's Theory of Forms, which 

Cognitive Categorization is the exercise of the mind's correlation function using rules derived from experience. This is where the margin of error in reasoning occurs because of the lack of a standard knowledge classification system.

Categorization is the assignment of objects to categories (in accordance with the classification rules). (As of 26-03-02, Wikipedia still equates classification with categorization.)

SLC class system

The Secular Library Classification system is divided into seven partitions. The first partition, zero, and designated "Reality," introduces the rules for navigating the remaining realms of knowledge. 

Realms are the largest conceptual systems. Realms do not exist as specific, independent entities.

0##: Reality 

1##: Nature

2##: Technology

3##: Life

4##: Society

5##: Culture 

6##: Time

General Categories are the independent entities that comprise the specific Realms. The general categories are relationships of the realm

#00: Process

#10: System

#20: Standard

#30: Agency

#40: Activity

#50: Domain

#60: Chronologies

Collation is the seven-element list of the simplest concepts. The simplest concepts do not exist.  The collation is used to organize the system of realms and general categories.

##0: conceptualizations

##1: systemations

##2: utilizations

##3: individuations

##4: organizations

##5: doctrinations

##6: transformations

Each category has a unique code of attributes for identifying its position in the taxonomy.

Demarcation of Law Separation Theory

Mr. Madison will cease turning over in his grave and may finally rest in peace. 

The category mistake in the conventional description of the Three-part Separation Theory was practically adjusted by recognizing that the judicial branch is inevitably responsible for the review of the law. Therefor, the three branches are the processing  stages (administration) of law: legislate, execute, and adjudicate. 

The Demarcation of Law Separation Theory suggests that the powers of government are primarily separated into three sections of law; executive, administrative, and legislative law. The legislative law can then be subdivided into four separate jurisdictions of what is essentially, civil law; diplomacy, commercial, trust, and property law. Providing the system of law necessary for balancing and more accurately formulating control of the powers that should meet our modern expectations for checks and balances.

The commissioning of specific jurisdictions of civil law, each with its own legislature, executive security department, and graduated review system will fulfill what was prescribed by Mr. Madison in the political science scholars' favorite essay, Federalist Papers Number 51: “each department should have a will of its own; and consequently should be so constituted that the members of each should have as little agency as possible in the appointment of the members of the others, . . . divide the legislature into different branches; and to render them, by different modes of election and different principles of action.”

The unchallenged argument we endure is that the bicameral legislative assemblies are not commissioned exclusive jurisdictions of law to guard (principles of action), and that incalculable aspect surrendered the entire system to flawed partisanship. The addition of the Seventeenth Amendment, making the Senate elections public (modes of election) like the House of Representatives, captured the All-American duopoly of forever-wavering political parties. The primary doctrine of the duopoly evolved into doing whatever it takes to win public elections in the persistent effort to populate the three branches in partisan alignment to overrule the competing faction, rather than guarding the commission of the branch to check the abuses in the other branches.

Legislative assemblies commissioned for specific jurisdictions of law with graduated appointment rules are inclined to faction based on the arguable aspects associated with the isolated system of law, rather than the general political parties' promises to relieve artificial and frivolous grievances. The Demarcation of Law Separation model with exclusive legislative assemblies and corresponding security departments will further fulfill the ambition to provide each partition with “a will of its own,” because each partition will have robust career paths for their members compared to the whimsical career paths for the present elected offices, isolated paths in the bureaucracy, and stagnate judiciary. 

Trust Law

Trust Law is the identification and regulation of trust.

Trust Law is regulated by the League of Attorneys, administered by the Treasury, and executed by various security agencies, and most likely including the Department of Justice.

The League of Attorneys is comprised of the states attorneys general, and possibly the state and federal prosecutors.

Depending on whether the Treasury goes into the Interior or not. The theory being the currency is put in the trust of the lawyers for the people.

Property Law

Property Law is regulated by the Network of Representatives, administered by the Department of the Interior, and executed by various security agencies.

The representation should be a sophisticated, graduated, and proportional system for managing multiple economic and moral ideologies.

The federal government will sponsor six seats for each municipality.

The state government will sponsor the six seats, and further seats based on a proportional formula to be determined in the states' constitutions for membership in the states' legislatures.

The municipalities are responsible for any further representation in the municipal councils.

Commercial Law

Commercial Law is regulated by the Board of Governors, administered by the Department of Commerce, and executed by various security agencies.

The Board of Governors will probably be comprised of the state governors and commerce chairmen - two votes per state.

Diplomacy

Diplomacy is regulated by the Senate of Jurists and administered by the Department of State Affairs.

The Senate of Jurists will consist of six jury pools. The civil law juries will have one to four state jurists, depending on the docket needs. representing the constitution and civil laws of the constituent state. The administrative jury will probably be comprised of ambassador candidates nominated by the state judiciaries. The sovereignty jury will probably be comprised of the state governors, and the docket will probably include federal executions, declarations of war, and selection for the commander-in-chief for any war.

Adm jury Intel and mill confirm

Administrative Law

Administrative Law is the identification and regulation of government entities

Administrative Law is guarded by the

1. judiciary
2. judicial system
3. court system

The placement of the military department in the commission of the partition suggests that the court system will go through its thorough system for decision-making.