Skip to main content

Secular Library

Notes Concerning the Research & Development


The Wikipedia articles suggest that there are criticisms of the Dewey and Library of Congress classification systems. I believe that the Secular Library Classification system is the best attempt at solving the inadequacies described in any criticisms. 

I think the SLC is a balanced outline of the dimensions of knowledge



Collation Theory


My casual research leads me to suspect that the SLC collation theory solves several undetermined attribute codes in social constructionism and psychology


Crash Course Videos


Over the years, I have watched many of the Crash Course videos on government and American History, and the other day I found that they have a series on philosophy. Philosophy is a subject area that I need to review in the research of dialectics for my treatise on social constructionism and knowledge classification. 


The highlight so far, after twenty of the forty-seven videos, is a maxim that was displayed. 

I am very certain that the motive behind my commitment to writing the treatises has been to ensure that Order and Justice are properly established.

I jumped to a video title that I just could not resist, because it has one of my keywords: "Categorical Imperatives." I have to know what is being discussed in "categories." 

As it turned out, the discussion is about morality, and the categorical imperatives presented are two of a four-element system of secular morality. I didn't know there was such a formulation. And there are others. 

I have read some things about Utilitarianism - I cannot remember what I was interested in at the time, but that is what the next video is about. So I was able to skip the discussions about the theist moral system. Maybe, I will watch them anyway.





Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ontology

Notes Concerning Semantics
Post a Comment
Read more

The Constitution is Junk

Every week now, there is another pedestrian argument proclaiming the virtues of the Almighty United States Constitution. It goes on and on because political science is not a science. Some colleges call it "government studies," but it is all the same - none of the scholars are sophisticated enough to critique the Three-part Separation Theory. The Three-part Separation Theory was miscalculated and improperly deployed, and the result is a system of Constitutional theology and dogma preventing the search for a more reliable government charter system. The starting point for understanding the perpetually cycling problems of the erroneous three-branch governing system is that all of the executive power is in the executive branch, and the subsequent security departments lack an orderly organization of that power. The partisan problem is that the legislative assemblies are generally commissioned, publicly elected, and unsupervised. The judicial problem is because the administrative po...
Post a Comment
Read more