Sovereignty

Sovereignty is what makes the social system unique or similar to other social systems.

The sovereignty of a social system is invested in its leadership structure.

The Executive Administration is comprised of the Justice and Security Councils

The Justice Council is comprised of the President, Chief Justice, and the four leaders of the Congress.

1. President
2. Chief Justice

Congress:

1. Foreman of the Senate
2. Chairman of the Board
3. Attorney General
4. Speaker of the Network

The Security Council is comprised of the leaders of the six security departments

1. National Security Advisor
2. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
3. Chief of Protocol
4. Commerce Commissioner
5. Solicitor General
6. Superintendent of the Interior

The Executive Administration is to be compelled to meet for a public discussion about current events as often as possible. A definite schedule should not be necessary and should coordinate with holidays and major events. Each member should be qualified to request meetings and issue agenda plans for legislation, with a complete phase projection.

030. Demarcation of Law Separation Theory

26-10-06 Mirror, Mirror on the wall, tell me: what might be political hierarchy theory?

Political hierarchy theory examines how power, authority, and decision-making are vertically stratified and organized within political systems or international relations. [1, 2]

Depending on the subfield of political science, the concept is analyzed through several distinct frameworks:

Domestic Governance and State Structure

• Institutional Layers: Within national governments, power is typically arranged through legal-rational authority (such as the separation of powers into executive, legislative, and judicial branches) and federalism, which stratifies duties between national, state, and local levels. [2, 3]
• Bureaucracy: Max Weber's foundational organizational analysis describes domestic political hierarchies as formal chains of command where superordinate offices direct subordinate units through strict rules and specialization. [3]

International Relations (IR)

• Challenging Anarchy: Traditional IR theory assumes the global system is purely anarchic (lacking a world government). However, modern hierarchy theory in international politics argues that formal and informal hierarchies—where powerful states exercise relational authority or indirect control over smaller states—coexist with global anarchy. Scholars like David Lake define this through negotiated or bargained relations where dominant states provide security and economic order in exchange for compliance from subordinate states. [4, 5, 6]

Theories of Power Distribution

• Elite vs. Pluralist Models: Political scientists debate how power cascades in a hierarchy. Elite theory asserts that a small, privileged minority (wealthy individuals, corporate leaders, or entrenched officials) holds the ultimate apex of political influence. Pluralist theory counters that power is fluid and contested across diverse, competing interest groups that lobby the hierarchical structure from below. [7]

If you would like to explore this further, let me know if you are interested in:

• International relations hierarchy (such as hegemony and power transitions)
• Domestic elite/bureaucratic models
• Historical examples of centralized vs. decentralized political orders

[1] https://www.cambridge.org

[2] https://www.studysmarter.co.uk

[3] https://www.britannica.com

[4] https://www.insanvetoplum.org

[5] https://academic.oup.com

[6] https://modeldiplomat.com

[7] https://www.youtube.com

020. Legacy Constructs

Congress

 

SLC:Theory & Nomenclature

The Secular Library Classification system suggests that a semantic/concept collation pattern can be used to organize a comprehensible system for explicit knowledge, which should benefit humanity. 

Time

 26-08-19

Culture

 26-08-19

Society

 26-08-19

Life

 26-08-19

Technology

 26-08-19

Nature

 26-08-19

010. State of the Government

060. Convention Rules

The first few conventions will be doing the exploratory work, and after that the procedure will be familiar and much more efficient for the remaining government jurisdictions.

The first conventions will have at least three stages. A single court that puts together the system for a three court convention. After a successful three court convention, then there is a six-court convention.

After all the bugs are exercised, then the remaining jurisdictions can limit the convention courts to the number of courts the jurisdictions expect to deploy. Single courts for small towns, three courts for standard municipalities, and six courts for large cities, state, and the federal government.

Charter conventions should be trial runs of the legislature, laser-focused on constructing a charter.

26-08-18 This might be boring - dominated by lawyer litigation, if they do not have a system they already agree to.

050. Delegate Qualifications

 26-08-18: The delegate qualification system can be divided into at least six main categories. Most of the participants will be lawyers. Experts witnesses may be asked to participate, but they will probably require exquisite resumes.

040. Formatting

 26-08-18: The Six-part system is only concerned with the order of the first three levels of the charter articles.

Another Political Science Game-Changer

 26-08-04: Upon browsing the 320.9 section of the downtown library, I encountered this title.

If We Can Keep It: How the Republic Collapsed and How it Might be Saved

Michael Tomasky

Either Mr. Tomasky or his publishing agent is a serious narcissist

A game-changing account of the deep roots of political polarization in America and, finally a fourteen-point agenda for how to fix it.

That is how the cover jacket introduces the blurbs. I only recognize two of the five distinguished reviewers: Jeffrey Toobin and Joy Reid. Upon review of the first sentence, I realized Mr. Tomasky is an unrepentant libtard. "The Constitutional Convention passes the Connecticut Compromise by a vote, 5-4-1, creating the inherently unrepresentative United States Senate." 

Only Libtards describe the Senate as something other than what it is supposed to be. I cannot believe Mr. Tomasky does not understand that the Senate is supposed to represent the states. The erroneous Seventeenth Amendment diverted the noble intention. The Amazon site for the book changes the blurb introduction.

A game-changing account of the deep roots of political polarization in America, including an audacious fourteen-point agenda for how to fix it.

It appears that the powers that be explained to Mr. Tomasky and his agent that there are a lot of books out there with suggestions for how to fix the partisan problem, much less the governing problem. Tomasky does not hide his game-changing fourteen points until the end of the book, he outlines them at the beginning. Which is commendable, because ultimately that is what matters. He divides them into two groups:

Political Fixes:

1. End Partisan Gerrymandering
2. Bring Back At-Large Congressional Elections
3. Introduce Ranked-Choice Voting to Congressional Elections
4. Expand the House of Representatives to 500 Members
5. Eliminate the Filibuster
6. Get rid of the Electoral College (or Make it Obey the Popular Vote)
7. Revive Moderate Republicanism

Social and Cultural Fixes:

1. Establish "Foreign" Interstate College-Student Exchange Programs Between Blue and Red States
2. Reduce College to Three Years and Make Year Four a Service Year
3. Expand Student Exchange Programs to High Schools
4. Make Large National Employers Offer Similar Exchange Programs for Employees
5. Vastly Expand Civics Education
6. Insist on a Left that Doesn't Contribute to the Fracture
7. Demand that Corporate and Business Leaders Commit to Social Responsibility.

Mr. Tomasky is obviously a closet Communist!

Again, as I am sure I will find in every political science scholar's book, there is no consideration of reformulating the separation of government powers. I am the only proponent of such a theory.

Constitutional Blasphemy

Relic: How Our Constitution Undermines Effective Government--and Why We Need a More Powerful Presidency

William G. Howell

Terry M. Moe

In a recent query of my own slogan, "The Constitution is junk," I encountered this title. Published in 2016. It seemed familiar, but I have no file on it in my collection of files and notes. I would have remembered the "more powerful presidency." I really want to read this, but I am out of the habit of reading books. I want to see if I can follow their line of reasoning to a "More Powerful Presidency." That seems absurd - doesn't it?

These are a couple of highly respected political science professors at big-time universities. The four blurbs are good endorsements. I recognize Sanford Levinston. I am sure I have written him once.

Howell and Moe deserve immense credit for 'connecting the dots' between our dangerously dysfunctional political system and an outmoded Constitution. One can only admire their willingness to challenge the cult of the Constitution that affects our political culture and hope their book gets widespread attention that it so richly desreves.

Two of the other blurbs suggest that their theory will "trigger" and "set the terms" for a debate. 

I have read just a little bit. The introduction and the start of the first chapter, and they take the time to ease the reader into understanding the issues that the American Founders were concerned with and how that shaped their formulation of the government back then. I learned that Montisquieu posed the bicameral legislature, which supports my unpublished theory that the Great Compromise is a half-truth. I am disappointed that they define the Senate as representative of the elite class rather than the laws of the states, which is what I believe should be the preferred intention, if it was not the intention of the Founders.

They are also claiming that the Founders intended for the judiciary to interpret and review the law, which contradicts my understanding of the outcome of the Marbury versus Madison Supreme Court ruling.

If I don't get anything else from their book, it is that this book was unable to trigger the debate after ten years.

SLC: General Categories

26-09-27 Recently reassigned the 000. Processes to "interfaces" because I reassigned 100. Energy to "Phenomenon," because the definition for phenomenon affirmed my earlier suspicion that I did not deliberate, because I thought "interface" was a recent term.

phenomenon

    n 1: any state or process known through the senses rather than by intuition or reasoning

    2: a remarkable development

I had it at 110. Phenomenon, because it is more general than "Energy."

26-05-05 Reconsidering 440. State to Polity.

A few years ago, I thought "State" was the general category, but the subsequent categories I listed seemed too customized to my preference for accessing the sovereign states.

For my Scrivener list I have it replicating the government charter realms

440: State

• 441: Sovereignty
• 442: Justice
• 443: Liberty
• 444: Economics
• 445: Trust
• 446: Property

But in my computer directory, I have collation list for accessing the states, which I thought belongs in the subcategories under 441: Sovereignty of the scriv list

440: State

• 441: geographical
• 442: undefined
• 443: national
• 444: state
• 445: local
• 446: international

SLC: Subcategories

Subcategories are categories subsequent to the general categories. The subcategories are alpha-numerically coded to the right of the septenary point and are not confined to the septenary or semantic collations. 

321.#########

It is expected that at some point in the hierarchy, categories have unique systems of subcategories, and possibly different systems for the same topic in different general categories.

Property Law

Property Law is regulated by the Network of Representatives, administered by the Department of the Interior, and executed by various security agencies.

The representation should be a sophisticated, graduated, and proportional system for managing multiple economic and moral ideologies.

The federal Network of Representatives will probably accept either three or six council members from each municipality.

The state governments will sponsor the three or six offices in each municipality for the state networks, and may independently sponsor further offices, based on a proportional formula to be determined in the state's constitution for membership in the state's legislature.

The municipalities are responsible for any further sponsorship of representation in the municipal councils.